-
Website
http://www.insidethehall.com/ -
Original page
http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/10/27/yeah-um-dont-expect-bob-knight-to-show-up-to-the-hof-ceremony/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: Loyola (Md.)
1 day ago · 63 comments
-
Pick to Click: Loyola (MD)
3 days ago · 64 comments
-
Video: Josh Selby likes to dunk (and pass, too)
1 day ago · 15 comments
-
Pick to Click: North Carolina Central
6 days ago · 65 comments
-
Good, Bad, Ugly: NCCU
4 days ago · 35 comments
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: Loyola (Md.)
For the better part of 40 years, the vast majority of IU fans have put up with Knight's bullying and at times embarrassing behavior because he won. Knight has seldom returned their love - even over the past eight years when most have defended him and demonized the late Myles Brand and the adminstration for having the guts to stand up to Knight.
Well, everyone involved in that epsiode is gone. Tom Crean and the current administration have bent in two to embrace IU tradition abd its former players. Selecting Knight for the IU Hsll of Fame was the right thing to do, and the invitation was extended in a way that would have allowed everyone to win.
Unfortunately,Knight once again seems intent on proving he doesn't have a gracious bone in his body. First, he doesn't even respond to Fred Glass' invitation. Then he burns the olive branch extended to him and throw it back at the alumni, proving once again that for Knight it's either his way or no way at all.
This year's Hall of Fame celebration stands to be a memorable one with Jerry Yeagley and Steve Downing - two men who exmemplify Hoosier pride - highighting the evening.
I hope we celebrate those who show up and don't spend the evening whining about the on who couldn't be bothered.
IU....IU...IU
(May be wrong on this but, I highly doubt he can honestly say that he never accepted anything from any alumni as those 'donations' are used in a great many ways to benefit the sports programs)
I will enjoy the upcoming season without losing a bit of sleep over this.
IU tried...all they can do!!
First, according to what I read, Knight’s attorney’s were involved in this negotiation. Is he saying that his attorney’s accept deals on his behalf without his knowledge, or is he just angry that the deal came to light?
Second, accepting money from alumni at this point is a false morality as he isn’t subject to NCAA rules. Does he think this university operates without alumni support? Should other entities in the university not take alumni donations? If not, why not?
Third, IU tries to extend the olive branch but he take shots at us. Again.
Fourth, he’s not coming to the HOF induction. Time to move on. For good.
If he doesn't he will lose the support of the fans , then who cares what Knight is doing or thinking!!!
Bobby, Get your **** together. Time is running out!!!
Anyway, i have been a fan from the 60's and will continue with my support as always. RMK was great for the University BB program but those days are gone, let"s move on and support our present coach and players. I am so tired of this topic-------RMK does not care about us, let the divorce RIP. the more people want him to come back, the more he will enjoy sticking it to them. just quit talking about him and move on.
But there will be former Hoosier coach who won six championships with nothing but class at the ceremony. Jerry Yeagley thoroughly deserves to be there with Bell, Counsilman, Billingsley, and all the other great coaches who dominated their sports in the IU Hall of Fame. Even though he's been under-appreciated, I'm actually kinda glad Jerry Yeagley won't be sharing the spotlight with Knight.
I enjoyed the many teams he put together over the years, but I think I might finally be done with caring if the guy ever comes back. If he grows up, great, otherwise, the past is past. Time to move on.
He's a jerk . I'm shocked that he hasn't received a heart attack for being so angry over so many little things.
Coach Crean will be there when we induct him in 30 years!
I am not blaming IU or RMK but it smells like lawyers who have their egos involved and cannot find a process for reconciliation. I really donot see what the university has to lose by reconciling with him. But RMK however has his principles to lose, whatever they are, that he tenaciously holds to.
I feel the fans, TC, current players, the AD, the program and its legacy are all victims in this childish game.
It seems like you are the one on here who gets RMK's point. I disagree with his style, but it's obviously not about the money for him. He felt disrespected that the university didn't extend the olive branch, it was the alumni.
a) it is a "very private matter"
b) but IU Admin makes a "public announcement"
==> THIS IS THE FIRST MISTAKE
c) IU has refused to face its obligations for 9 years
d) But alumni ( not IU ) attempts a payment to resolve it
==> THIS IS THE 2nd MISTAKE
e) Enabling IU Admin and its lawyers to duck its obligations again
==> THIS IS THE FUNDAMENTAL MISTAKE in the entire saga
If this version is accurate then the principle of the matter is pretty clear. RMK is trying to hold IU Admin responsible for something he believes is their duty , NOT the alumni's duty. To him an alumni "bribe" is not an answer for him or for any coach at IU now or in the future............whatever this private matter is.
Did IU make a public announcement, or were they obligated to do so by a FOI request from the Herald Times?
It is not a bribe anymore than an alumni donation to the music school to secure the chair of a professor is a bribe.
Knight committed a misdemeanor assault. In your work place is your company responsible to defend assaults committed by its workers? No.