-
Website
http://www.insidethehall.com/ -
Original page
http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/09/30/what-to-do-with-a-problem-like-bud/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: Loyola (Md.)
12 hours ago · 31 comments
-
Pick to Click: Loyola (MD)
1 day ago · 64 comments
-
Tom Crean talks about Bawa’s progress
1 day ago · 20 comments
-
Pick to Click: North Carolina Central
4 days ago · 65 comments
-
Live Blog: Loyola @ Indiana
19 hours ago · 7 comments
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: Loyola (Md.)
On a side note I'm disappointed in my fellow hoosiers who immediately trash kids from any school who get into trouble (like in Illinois and Purdue). These problems go beyond the realm of basketball, and one should hope that a kid can recover and learn from past mistakes.
Jaime
I agree that if Mackey is convicted and goes to jail, this is all a moot point. My biggest beef with how this is being discussed by IU fans is how so many are already writing this kid off and moving on to the next recruit.
At the New Albany recruit game back in early August, it was amazing how many people came up and spoke to this young man. He was trying to warm up to play the game and 40-year old men were coming onto the court and asking for a picture with him or for an autograph. And every time, he obliged and did it with a smile on his face.
Fast forward to the present and these same types are going onto various message boards and trashing Mackey at a time when he needs support above all else. These same people who couldn't wait for him to come to IU just a few days ago are now saying that IU should wash their hands completely clean of him.
I am by no means advocating that he should come to IU or be given a second chance. We need to first wait and see how this turns out in the court system.
However, what the fan base should do is support this young man who obviously needs help to rehabilitate his life. Basketball should be the least of his concerns. It sickens me to say things like "Bud is gone, who do we go after now?" Come on people, show some class. If everyone who cared about him just abandons him now that he no longer has potential as a basketball player, he will end up on the streets and will get in trouble again.
My experiences with Bud have been nothing but positive and even if he is guilty of what he is accused of, I will support him and hope that he hasn't ruined his life. Everyone else should think about doing the same.
As a "teacher" and a person who believes in the "good" of people and especially kids, I want KS and IU to give Bud the opportunity to redeem himself from this and turn his life around, not for the good of his basketball career but for the good of his life!
My gut tells me....if Bud is not getting 3 squares in the pokey....KS will give Bud the opportunity to redeem himself. I just hope Bud is prepared for what it will take, how mentally tough he will have to be, and how he can use basketball to get on the right path....
Excellent blog big A and the other bloggers...
To the point though, he made his choices and there are consequences. One of which is the losing the opportunity to play basketball at Indiana University. I hope Mackey gets his life turned around. But there is no excuse for this incident if he intended to be a Division I basketball player.
There is no justification, in my opinion, for giving this young man a scholarship to a Big Ten university when so many of his and my peers and working and taking out loans to pay for education.
Tom, I was a special education student till I finished high school. I graduated IU with honors, and I'm pursuing my PHD at UNC. Just because you have a disability does not make you an idiot. Not trying to pick a fight, but what grades a kid gets does not reflect if one is a good person. I'm not going to judge Mackey right off the bat. If coach Sampson feels that this kid can learn from this incident he has my backing. I would be proud of my University knowing that instead of abondaning him, we gave him a chance. Don't get me wrong, he has no wiggle room but if learns from his mistakes perhaps we might actually save a life instead of seeing one go down in the dumps.
I give Bud zero wiggle room or "zero tolerance" if he comes to IU and I TRULY believe if we were talking about "Tyler Zeller or Eric Gordon" the conversation and post would be more forgiving and tolerable...because they are Indiana kids.
I am sure this opens another hypotheical can of worms but think about it take out Bud and fill in...Eric or Tyler...then write your post.
I feel very sorry for the young man. He is however 18 and responsible for his actions.
Really, if there was an illegal search and the evidence is inadmissible, Bud was still carrying crack and more than likely smoking dope. Those are actions that should preclude Bud from wearing an IU uniform.
Why?
1) IU reputation. We've had bad eggs before, and will again. But this is a different level.
2) Coach Sampson's reputation. We know CKS is a great guy, but public perception is still looking at him as a cheater. Throw this in the mix and the negative buzz keeps going.
3) Actions have consequences.
I hope Coach looks to how UNC handled the JamesOn Curry situation -- a professional and compassionate way to manage the situation -- that is IF Bud gets out of the legal mes he is in.
But there is ZERO tolerance for drugs on school grounds and I wouldn't be surprised to see Bud go away for a long, long time.
There are offenses that are excusable and offenses that are inexcusable. If the kid pled guilty to, say, sexual assault, can we live with that? What about if he's caught cheating on a test? What if it was marijuana rather than cocaine?
It seems to me that some of these scenarios are easy to answer. Some of them are difficult to answer.
I don't think the possession of crack cocaine is a difficult one to answer. It's unacceptable and should remain such. I realize that we all want Bud to come to IU to play -- but we should not be willing to mortgage our souls to have him.
This does not mean that Sampson has to turn his back on the kid. Sampson can continue to act as a friend and as a mentor and help support and advise him if he chooses to put his life back on the right track. He can show that he continues to care about Mackey as a person, and not just as a basketball player.
And Sampson could even make him a deal. Sampson could say that if Mackey resolves his legal problems and demonstrates a serious commitment to turning his life around by going to a junior college, getting good grades, and staying out of trouble for two years, there will be an IU scholarship waiting for him at the end of the process.
Giving a second chance in a case like this only works if the kid is really committed to turning a new page. And the risk is that the kid concludes that he doesn't really have to change his ways because his talent will always be great enough to make people overlook his sins.
Mackey needs to know that there's only a place for him at IU if he really is willing to live up to IU's standards. Given the seriousness of this transgression, next fall is too soon to be sure about the answer to that question. I want to see more proof about his intentions before I see him in an IU jersey.
So, what's up with the kid? Will he receive treatment/help? Has he been arrested, charged with a crime, etc.? Will he play ball in college...at IU?
I appreciate your observation, but I think you're supporting the point I was trying to make there: Crack is far less acceptable to the average, white, midwestern IU fan than a "party" drug like ecstasy would be. I draw no such difference; to be honest, if Mackey wasn't doing crack, I don't have that much problem with him selling it. The reality for plenty of black male youth in this country is that selling drugs is literally their only option, whether for short-term or long-term financial gain. Without getting into an argument on the War on Drugs in this country (stupid, stupid, stupid), that's how I feel.
So I appreciate your comment, but I promise I wasn't trying to hold up that cultural bias. Rather, I was trying to expose it. I definitely should have been more clear.