-
Website
http://www.insidethehall.com/ -
Original page
http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Voting now open for Indiana student section
20 hours ago · 36 comments
-
Settling in for the long haul
2 days ago · 46 comments
-
Pick to Click: Boston University
5 days ago · 111 comments
-
Pick to Click: George Mason
4 days ago · 79 comments
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: George Mason
3 days ago · 43 comments
-
Voting now open for Indiana student section
These charges are related in that either
1. the coaches subverted the system ==> no failure to monitor
2. system failed the coaches ==> failure to monitor
It seems to me when you decide the role of the coaches you must also decide the role of the monitoring system.
SOunds to me that NCAA cannot meet their deadline and have "spun" this to look like they are giving IU more time, as if we needed it and asked for it. Nice of them
Oh wait, that's not within the NCAA's jurisdiction and they still don't have enough information to make an investigation about it. I forgot.
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug...
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=338...
Any coach, with any sense and will to comply and in their right mind, who had just been severely penalized ...........would have demanded to know day by day the status of calls and visits.
Did he not know when the phone was handed to him ? He needed compliance to tell him ?
In any event when I reviewed all the calls and you:
1. eliminate Morris twins ( NCAA counted as one player ) and Mackey
2. eliminate calls under 3minutes as NCAA usually does
You get about 30 violations not 130 almost all of which apply to Senderhoff
1. The NCAA can't meet their own deadline...or
2. There is some new revelation or information they have received or found in the investigation notes that they are now wanting to consider so they can make a more accurate appraisal of IU's response when it is received.
They can judge the coaches and IU separately by simply deciding to look at only the information pertinent to current focus of deliberation and keep the rest, unviewed until required.