-
Website
http://www.insidethehall.com/ -
Original page
http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/21/the-morning-after-penn-state/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Voting now open for Indiana student section
20 hours ago · 36 comments
-
Settling in for the long haul
2 days ago · 46 comments
-
Pick to Click: Boston University
5 days ago · 111 comments
-
Pick to Click: George Mason
4 days ago · 79 comments
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: George Mason
3 days ago · 43 comments
-
Voting now open for Indiana student section
DJ showed the ability to DECIDE. In the past he seemed lost when the double team came. Perhaps it was more evident against a team using a lot of zone defense, I don't know, but I noticed these things yesterday.
1. DJ knew WHERE the double team was coming from, not just that it was coming. This allowed him to either turn in to the lane or to the outside to avoid the defenders. The result was better shots with less pressure being applied.
2. When the double team got there before he could effectively get a shot, he didn't aimlessly try and dribble through it like in years past. He kicked it out quickly and the offense either reset or another pass led to an open three.
I think our offense and defense are still pretty subpar, but I continue to see positive signs that give me reason to stay encouraged.
In all seriousness, our zone breaker should be to feed Ellis in the bottom right corner and allow him to use his left hand to penetrate into the middle of the zone and do anything he wants basically. He is a great weapon against the zone for creating his own shot and creating shots for others.
I was at the game for a half, and was surprised to see the Hoosiers really crush Penn State at the end. Credit to Penn State for slowing down the game so much, that is basically what they have to do in order to keep things competitive, but impressive that the Hoosiers were able to gain a big lead in a game like that.
In all fairness, I was once of Lance's biggest haters at the start of this year, but must say that he has been instrumental to our success in the last three games. Outside of the possession where his man got 3 offensive rebounds in a row in the first half, he played another solid game and it is good to see him finally knocking down his shots. His rebounding and lack of physicality down low is of great concern for me.
Take Mich St for example: With Suton at Center, that leaves Lance to guard a player like Marquise Gray which is a horrible mismatch for him. Next Saturday's UCONN game will be interesting as well with DJ matching up on Thabeet, leaving Lance to fend off much more athletic players like Adrien and Robinson. I think our lack of athleticism at the four will really hurt us, but would like nothing more than to be proved wrong.
Good call on Lance, though. I think now that our expectations are sufficiently lowered, we can appreciate the things he does do (hustle, the occasional three) well.
And yes, Talor Battle is Spanish. It's uncanny.
As for the game, I really think it was rather good basketball all around. The Hoosier's defense might have been lackluster at times, but it was nothing worse than I've come to expect from this team after 17 games. Penn State impressed, I totally wrote them off last Tuesday when Claxton went down. I honestly thought they would be a one man show with Cornley and a bunch of nobody's. But Penn State's other players really stepped up, especially Battle, who I admit I'd never even heard of before, sinking all those jumpers. Finally, it was nice to be reminded how good this team is at offense when there not playing a Tubby or Weber defense, that adjective effortless came back into usage after falling out of favor last week.
P.S. Awesome youtube clip. Monroe has to have one of the softest shots ever, some of them look like the ball is just tickling the rim until the basket smiles just a little wider for the ball to fall through. Definitely a player Ellis takes after, and hopefully one he'll be even more like by the end of his IU career.
My solution is to basically create a reverse match up problem and run with four guards. I know I keep saying it, but just think it would work. I've said it before, but Ellis can guard a big man (he guarded #2 yesterday). He's lefthanded which is an automatic advantage, has good reach and decent size. He's not our No. 2 rebounder because he's a slouch. He certainly is no worse an option than Stemler defensively and a better offensive weapon than Mike White.
I say start
Armon - PG
EJ - G
AJ - G
Ellis - G/SF turned PF
White - Post
Bring in Jordan off the bench and Stemler off the bench. Mike White and DeAndre can fight for minutes to relieve DJ or to change up the four guard lineup.
I know AJ hasn't seemed like he deserves a start, but AJ isn't ever going to get it going this year unless he gets some quality confidence building minutes.
Thanks for the YouTube clip as well. If Ellis developed a jump shot, it's evident from the clip that he could be dominant. Not saying he'd be in the Pearl's league, but people respected the jump shot on him.
I appreciated your thougts, as well, on the pickup game analogy. I hope it's that, and think it is. It'll be nice to have @Wisco on a Thursday night, extra rest might help.
And I know this is belated and has nothing to do with anything, but my roomates and I's nickname for Mike White is Manbearpig. Half Man, half bear, half pig...manbearpig
I do miss Ted Kitchel tho
Before I came to IU, I lived in Iowa, so I didn't get to hear many regional broadcasts featuring local announcers. Then, during my time at IU, I went to every home game, meaning I didn't get to develop an affinity for any local announcing tandem.
So I'm just starting to form those familiarities. I know that kind of makes me a noob, but it is what it is. The only IU broadcaster I could pick out of a lineup is Fish -- but everyone can do that; he's ubiquitous.
Like I said, I'll take my licks on that one. But it wasn't out of pure ignorance, I promise.
"Milquetoast white guys" was not meant in any racist way; I wasn't comparing white announcers to those of another race, or claiming that whites as a race were bad at basketball play-by-play. Not only would that be weird, it would be demonstrably false.
I was merely claiming that to my ear, every analyst at BTN broadcasts are the same boring white guys we get every game from them. That they, to me, all blend together. I really didn't mean that to say that I would prefer a black guy or something; I meant it as, Wow, these guys are all the same to me.
I'd also remind you that racism is traditionally based in power, and while that's not the only application, calling me, a white guy, racist for criticism of white guys that I wasn't really invoking as a whole is just really oversensitive and off-base. (And this is coming from someone most people would probably call too sensitive to non politically correct language.) All allusions aside, let's lighten up here, huh?