-
Website
http://www.insidethehall.com/ -
Original page
http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/09/the-morning-after-kentucky/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: Loyola (Md.)
12 hours ago · 31 comments
-
Pick to Click: Loyola (MD)
1 day ago · 64 comments
-
Tom Crean talks about Bawa’s progress
1 day ago · 20 comments
-
Pick to Click: North Carolina Central
4 days ago · 65 comments
-
Live Blog: Loyola @ Indiana
19 hours ago · 7 comments
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: Loyola (Md.)
In addition to the above observations, it was nice to see big Dre out there making baskets, setting some huge screens (I especially liked the screen he set for Jordan where Crawford was able to split the Kentucky guys and head towards the basket) and just being active in general. Seeing Dre and Mike White out there with their enthusiasm and energy was pure excitement - now if only Dre could make a few more free throws.
as far as gordon's absence, i hope there isn't much more of it. but at the same time, i ridiculed iu fans yesterday who felt that there was absolutely no way they could win without him...that to me is absolutely ridiculous when you have guys like jamarcus ellis and dj white on your team.
iu fans are often referred to as "the iu faithful", and i sometimes question the faith that many of the fans have in this iu TEAM.
Overall the basketball played yesterday was pretty crappy, but IU still ended up with a 19 point win so that's good. But still too many turnovers, I hate turnovers. They really need to work on cutting down on turnovers before Big Ten play starts.
I am a bit frustrated that it seems like it's been one thing after another so far this season. I agree that you cannot place all of the blame on Sampson for off the court problems that aren't related to academics.
He does, however, need to have some accountability for how the players act off the court. After all, he is the leader of the program. I commend him for suspending players if they break team rules, but I hope he is making it known to each of them that this behavior is not acceptable and the next infraction will be dealt with a lot differently. All of the IU players are representatives of the university and are privileged to have their education paid for at one of the greatest institutions anywhere.
Let's hope from this point on we can all concentrate on what happens on the court and not player suspensions and phone calls.
Isn't that what a suspension does? You don't follow the rules - you don't play. I don't think you need to threaten any more than that to remind players what they're losing if they make poor decisions.
On at least 2-3 occasions, I recall Jordan hitting a big 3. The ensuing offensive possession, he immediately wanted a heat-check shot where he made no effort to run the offense, kept his down and tried to take his man one-on-one. These are freshman mistakes and of course EJ is guilty of them as well. I appreciate Crawford's fearlessness, but a point guard has to be in control and not have the mindset that, "I'm gonna show the world what I can do" when making decisions.
Still very early in the season and if these are the only things to complain about (besides the undisclosed suspensions), then I'm content.
I have no problem with criticizing him for the phone situation. He shouldn't have had the problem at Oklahoma. He CERTAINLY should have been more careful once he was at IU and on probation. I could go on in some detail about that, but I think it has all been said. It is very disappointing. But he is paying for that big time in dollars and cents and, perhaps most important, in damage to his reputation - and he deserves that. Hopefully, he has learned his lessons and it will never happen again. Ethics and morals ARE important and that is a lesson he needs to exemplify in order to teach it to the young men in his charge.
But kids screw up and, when they do, Coach Sampson obviously takes it seriously. And to that, I say, "Right on, Coach!" How can we criticize him for enforcing morals and ethics (unless you perhaps want to label him a hypocrite --- but that would suggest that he should allow them to violate morals and ethics since he does and I think that argument gets you absolutely nowhere.).
I also suspect that, in the long run, that kind of discipline is great for these kids. Remember, they're all highly recruited, highly touted. They read their names in the paper every day. They know that they are the focus of attention. Many of them will make good sums of money from their basketball talents and some of them stand to become very wealthy and have many of the best things that life has to offer because of their skill at throwing a round ball into a slightly larger elevated hoop.
Somebody has to say "no" to these kids if they screw up in one way or another.
And they need to learn humility, which can't be easy when everyone is telling you that you're the greatest.
The discipline will help them listen now and it will make them better players and, most important, better people. Being a good basketball player is great, but being a good person is critical - and, in the long run, probably makes them better basketball players too.
I have no problem with criticizing Coach Sampson for his mistakes, but if I do that, I certainly have to praise him for the good things he does - and hope that the balance tips further and further toward the good stuff. It's only fair.
West Coast Hoosier
Nice gurantee Anthony SMith, I am sure the Pats enjoyed the motivation
Linked to your recap and a few other around the Big Ten on my MSU blog.
www.spartansweblog.com
Cheers.
As for Crawford, I think he played well under the circumstances. One of the huge stories was the brother vs. brother match, it was his first game in a while and on national t.v. He normally comes off the bench and yesterday played basically the entire game. Given all of that I'd say he played really well. I think he'll be a huge weapon as a spark off the bench when Bassett and Gordon are playing.
I am still worried about what the NCAA will do when they complete their investigations. Hopefully, the self-imposed punishments will stand.
-- 81 points per game scored (1st in B10)
-- 49% overall shooting (1st in B10)
-- 40% 3 point shooting (2nd in B10)
-- 4 players averaging in double figures
(another averaging more than 8)
-- More free throws made than taken by opponents
(1st in B10 in attempts, 2nd in % made)
-- More assists than our opponents
-- Fewer turnovers than our opponents
The reason I posted the B10 rankings is so I won't get any quality of competition BS. All the B10 teams are playing patsies, so its fair to compare results so far.