-
Website
http://www.insidethehall.com/ -
Original page
http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/03/the-morning-after-iowa/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: Loyola (Md.)
12 hours ago · 31 comments
-
Pick to Click: Loyola (MD)
1 day ago · 64 comments
-
Tom Crean talks about Bawa’s progress
1 day ago · 20 comments
-
Pick to Click: North Carolina Central
4 days ago · 65 comments
-
Live Blog: Loyola @ Indiana
19 hours ago · 7 comments
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: Loyola (Md.)
The answer is simple- Give the ball to Eric Gordon to close out the game.
I somewhat agree on the Crawford comment. I love that he's fearless and confident and he really can score in droves. But he also never saw a shot he didn't like. He seems to always look to shoot or drive first and that gets frustrating from time to time.
I guess it's that old adage: "He's a freshman." Hopefully KS will wrangle him in when appropriate. Although, since our offense seems to be based around this kind of play maybe we'll just have to deal with it.
but i agree with the comments saying that a road win is a road win. Since IU is one of the top teams in the Big Ten and maybe the country, 9 times out of 10 we are going to get the best effort from teams we play on the road, and that is what happened last night. also on the road you will never get as many friendly calls from the refs, thats just the nature of the game. so a road win is a road win, no such thing as a bad road win.
I realize that Iowa was shooting the lights out but I'm a little surprised we did not use a few possessions of zone defense, particularly when DJ picked up his 3rd foul just to try and change the tempo up a little. Jamarcus is becoming a favorite of mine, still some defensive lapses but overall he's a gamer. Jordan Crawford's ball handling is maddening, his dribble is as high as Uew Blab's dribble. I do like his outside shooting though (how he can't hit foul shots perplexs me).
A road win is a win and that's the key. It was not pretty but we would have won by 8 or 9 had the 3pointers not started falling from all over. Maybe this will open their eyes to the rigors of Big Ten play.
I was releived that our first road game was a win, but I was stunned that Indiana did not get the ball to Gordon at the end of the game as someone else noted above... it did not even appear that they were trying to get it to him, that comes down to Coaching! It was directly from a timeout one time.
Hopefully, many of these items will be fixed in the next game and it was just first Big Ten road game gitters... we will see.
Critique Crawford all you want, but right in front of me I saw him get beat on a drive, recover, block the shot and keep possession. He also followed his missed shots which very few basketball players do these day.
Lastly, Stemler is a joke. The last out of bounds to him, he had someone at midcourt wide open, but instead of passing, he wants to be the hero, keeps possession and almost loses it for IU.
line more than anyone IU and North Carolina. EJ is a great shooter but 86% at the line is a better average than anything he shoots! He had more points than any IU freshman in history at his 1st Big Ten game. I hope he goes to the line 30 times a game if he can. Most of us grew up playing or coaching the Bob Knight motion offense so it drives us crazy not to see all the screens and movement of players but this is what IU does now so you can let it continue to drive you crazy or change and be happy. Why do you think NC goes to the line so much? They go one on one to the hole. The 2 teams are 26 wins and one loss. Also DJ
and Stemler are seniors and road tested. These freshman are not so if you can't get the ball to EJ and Bassett is hurt then DJ and Lance were our best percentage shooters at the line in the game. I believe last year IU was 2-6 on the road in big ten play
so we already have 1 road win. This is a good team!
I hope you were kidding (or intentionally using hyperbole) when you said, "We deserve it."
It's good to be a fan and root for IU. It's certainly acceptable and healthy to comment on team and individual player weaknesses. This is what I think most people on this board do.
But some people, the "We deserve it" crowd, go too far. They seem to identify themselves in an unhealthy way based on how IU is doing. That's why I hope you were joking or exaggerating when you said, "We deserve it." In my opinion, "You deserve better."
I definitely am not one of the "I deserve a good IU team" people -- I hate those people too. Their haughty sense of entitlement makes want to kick them in the balls, presuming, of course, they're male and have said balls to kick.
By "We deserve better", I was just trying to say that it's unfair to everyone involved to waste the talent on this team with sloppy defense and the other ugly stuff two nights ago. I just think it would be a shame to waste this team by being disorganized.