<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Inside the Hall - Latest Comments in The M(onday) After: Iowa, or not so bad this time, actually</title><link>http://insidethehall.disqus.com/</link><description>Indiana Hoosiers Basketball News, Recruiting and Analysis</description><atom:link href="https://insidethehall.disqus.com/the_monday_after_iowa_or_not_so_bad_this_time_actually/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:47:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The M(onday) After: Iowa, or not so bad this time, actually</title><link>https://www.insidethehall.com/2009/01/05/the-monday-after-iowa-or-not-so-bad-this-time-actually/#comment-4922613</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe I misunderstand what  "That positivity aside...". Doesn't that convey a  negatives? It's in a paragraph about the negatives.... Maybe it's just his grammar? LOL...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NC Fat Boy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:47:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The M(onday) After: Iowa, or not so bad this time, actually</title><link>https://www.insidethehall.com/2009/01/05/the-monday-after-iowa-or-not-so-bad-this-time-actually/#comment-4911796</link><description>&lt;p&gt;He called it serious progress, no?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Bozich</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:47:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The M(onday) After: Iowa, or not so bad this time, actually</title><link>https://www.insidethehall.com/2009/01/05/the-monday-after-iowa-or-not-so-bad-this-time-actually/#comment-4904183</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"That positivity aside, the Hoosiers still did the same bad things they always do. They turned the ball over, though only 11 times, which is serious progress."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Really? Only 11 TOs is not a positive? UNC averages 15/game and 11 is a negative?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This team played a good game on Saturday, TOs, rebounds, defense. Yes, a couple of freshman mistakes may have cost them the game. That's to be expected this year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But come on, 11 TOs is a negative?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I may start reading only the discussion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">NC Fat Boy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:26:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The M(onday) After: Iowa, or not so bad this time, actually</title><link>https://www.insidethehall.com/2009/01/05/the-monday-after-iowa-or-not-so-bad-this-time-actually/#comment-4892907</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Solid game, Williams was very good.  I think its time to press the entire game, we have no depth shortage as 1-9 aren't that far apart in talent level and we struggle stopping teams in half court.  The bad still being TO, rebounding, and watching Moore dribble as fast as he can to the baseline jump and throw the ball away.  I thought VJ showed he can play and improve and I'd rather see Story or Dumes play point when VJ needs a rest.  Its become pretty obvious why Moore received only one D1 scholarship offer&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Seth</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:22:24 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>