-
Website
http://www.insidethehall.com/ -
Original page
http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/13/good-bad-and-ugly-open-thread/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: Loyola (Md.)
12 hours ago · 31 comments
-
Pick to Click: Loyola (MD)
1 day ago · 64 comments
-
Tom Crean talks about Bawa’s progress
1 day ago · 20 comments
-
Pick to Click: North Carolina Central
4 days ago · 65 comments
-
Live Blog: Loyola @ Indiana
19 hours ago · 7 comments
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: Loyola (Md.)
Personally, I'd be curious to see what would happen.
I, for one, am already sick of all the people commenting on IU's lack of success already this season. Anyone who has REMOTELY followed Indiana basketball even for the last few months KNOWS that this year is going to be a major restructuring and rebuilding effort, and that each and every game played will be very difficult and challenging and unsightly as compared to years past. I'm even more distraught that this is coming from one of the authors of this IU basketball blog. You KNOW what this season is about, and you know how its going to turn out. Don't be so naive and expect flawless basketball to be played by a bunch of 18-19 year old kids who have been thrust onto a national stage. I don't mind the critiques and the talk about "what we could've potentially better," but to say things like "Horrendous, Atrocious, Deplorable" are quite demeaning to these kids... especially since you're obviously a fan yourself (otherwise you probably wouldn't be writing on this blog). I'm sick of the negativity already and we haven't even hit the Big 10 season. If you think this team is so terrible, awful, and difficult to watch--then DON'T. But quit ruining it for the rest of us.
You team played bravely, and I commend them for showing the effort and the heart I expected them to bring to Rupp. You can tell that today the Wildcats were much better adjusted team, and was able to out-talent Indiana on several aspects of the game. Kentucky can't expect to play a crazy tempo (like the first 5 minutes of the game) and hang with more disciplined teams.
I grew up in Western Kentucky on the Ohio River shoreline. I am very content that for this year there will be more UK stuff flying in Southern Indiana. Walking around Tell City in my Big Blue Starter jacket in 1991 was just stellar.
You guys have a long season ahead, and I hope that once your team gets better adjusted to the offense, you'll be able to surprise a few teams in the Big Ten. I have much respect for ITH and their readers, and I hope you guys pour on the love for your candy-striped soldiers this year. Good luck, Hoosiers, and we'll see you again next year.
We have to improve on the FT line though. Under 50% is inexcusable...
Didn't get to see the start of the game due to the OT of Memphis/Georgetown.
In all seriousness, these guys are great. They struggled mightily early. While the turnovers were pointed out often on the telecast, Kentucky was doing their best to keep up. IU just couldn't knock down the shots. If the shooting percentage had been near 50%, they would have been in the game at halftime.
As noted, IU won the second half. They protected the ball and played much better. Dumes and Williams were active. Jones was rusty, but it's good to see him back. Keep shooting Daniel! While you may not be converting going to the bucket, it will open up the offense. Pritchard fought valiantly.
I'm proud of these guys... a rough start and they hung in there and Kentucky could never completely put them away.
GO HOOSIER!
hoosier nation, we HAVE to stay positive and battle through this along with the team. We will be better because of this game, maybe it will prepare us to play at PU and UI and get a win. i wanna hear bruce make up an excuse this year too.
Look we played poorly at the outset in one of the toughest venues in the country with a bunch of freshmen and walk-on's against an experienced team. But we bounced back, made it respectable, and showed some grit. Any reasonable fan of IU should recognize this.
However, I've seen more experienced teams completely fold after a start like that. We could have lost this game by 50 points had the team not continued to fight.
As others have already said, we "won" the second half and made the final result look respectable to those who didn't watch. We also only turned the ball over 5 times in the second half, which is great.
I'm sure Kentucky's players lost their intensity in the 2nd half, but that's not the point. The point is that IU made halftime adjustments and looked much better after that horrendous stretch to open the game.
I predicted 7-5 to open the non-conference season and with a couple of home victories, that's still possible. I would say that's very respectable for this team so far.
#2. Why is our best 3 point shooter barely averaging 15 mins a game?? And when Roth is in the game, where are his screens,picks, or any offensive play-calls for the kid?? He lacks the ability to create his own shot, but that sure didn't stop the success of a former player named Alford...
#3 Can we get Jobe some more mins?? Sure the kid lacks any basketball skill whatsoever, but you can't teach size. A 7-footer in the middle of a zone defense (which we should be playing most of the time) will definitely limit the highlight reel dunks that teams are posterizing our kids with...He might learn the game and improve more if he gets more mins.
#4 I'd like to see Crean do a little less encouraging and more coaching. Coddling the young guys will only hold them back from their potential. Don't get in Story's face and bench him for one mistake and continue to let Moore turn the ball over whenever he wants without any disciplinary remarks from the coach. After barely scoring any points in the first 8 mins of the KY game with more turnovers than points, bench the starting 5 and bring in the next 5 off the bench to get their attention. I know this will be a slow and frustrating season but lets at least give our team the best chance of competing in each game and not being afraid to coach for W's.
But I don't really see why all that means we should be turning the ball over 20+ times a game.
I hope I'm "allowed" to say that.
I try to look at the silver lining...and just remember that a majority of those turnovers were very early in the game, so at least we got it under control eventually.
I'd like to see us get down to under 15 a game. That's something to shoot for in these next two games...slow it down and play under control...eliminate the unforced turnovers.
Crean wants these guys to get out run when they can, but you just can't be a running team when the teams you're playing against are twice your size and speed.
Though I was disappointed by IU's start (especially against KU, a team I love our boys to beat,) I was impressed by the 2nd half performance & I am encouraged by the progress of IU.
I suggest all to view the games with more REALISTIC expectations as they cheer for the glory of ol' IU & show some patience as the team struggles through the growing pains.