-
Website
http://www.insidethehall.com/ -
Original page
http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/01/28/good-bad-and-ugly-northwestern/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: Loyola (Md.)
1 day ago · 63 comments
-
Pick to Click: Loyola (MD)
3 days ago · 64 comments
-
Video: Josh Selby likes to dunk (and pass, too)
1 day ago · 15 comments
-
Pick to Click: North Carolina Central
6 days ago · 65 comments
-
Good, Bad, Ugly: NCCU
4 days ago · 35 comments
-
Good, Bad and Ugly: Loyola (Md.)
For all the bad VJ does at times, he made two BIG shots that made it good.
IU will win at least ONE Big Ten game this year, not sure against who but I can say this...........not that it will EVER happen but if there ever was a time for a coach to get some votes or recognition of coach of the year it would be Tom Crean this year.
He coaches these guys 'up' but it is up to them to get over at least one time. His intensity never changes, his enthusiams comes through the screen and you can see he loves this team/IU. A positive things.........wait until these guys get some more talent, experience, and confidence........IU will RULE the Big Ten.
Never have I enjoyed a game so much where we still came up short. Reminds me of an old college girl friend, a lot fun but will break your heart.
Still lovin' the improvement!
You said it Kelin, Crean looked like he was ready to lash 'em up & go play. Great intensity.
I cannot stress, how I like how Verdell earlier in the game got chewed out by crean, came back in, showed some maturity and made two big shots......that is a sign of growth...........(And Crean lit into his ass good for whining about a call)
The kids played hard, it actually looked like a college basketball game. They put up 72 points on the best defensive team in the B10/11. I thought Dumas gave the Moore kid a little bit of a cheap shot on the floor, which got him going. Also, they dominated the boards, Pritchard did not score a ton, but he got 10 rebounds.
How can you control Coble throwing in those ridiculous shots? He is starting to remind me of Larry Bird Lite with his shot making ability.
The final turnover killed me especially when I thought I saw someone standing in the corner to at least get the ball in. I also was not sure if there were any timeouts left or not....I thought I saw Calbert Cheaney behind the bench, it's just a matter of time before he is on the staff.
Coble is a player! that is about all I can say about the kid. I just hope he is a senior. I did see a mock NCAA tourney that had NW in the tourney and I hope that happens.
They didn't have any timeouts at the end but....WHen Pritchar set the first screen he was open underneath for 3seconds then flashed to the ball.."without" meeting the ball but it was a slow bad bound pass....
Again.......Helluva Game.
Is it me or did Williams have monumental trouble playing the game last night ? Fouling out in 19 minutes of PT w/o much to show for it really hurt.
What else does Story have to do to get more minutes? He ABSOLUTELY should be in the starting lineup eating into Taber and Williams minutes. Aside from Dumes and at times Jones, he's the only true offensive threat that can create for himself. I really like that guy.
The defining moment of this game for me, in terms of the future of the program, was in the game tying possession with 30 second left. (I love DVR so I can go back and slow things down) Matt Roth is camped in the corner on the weak side. He is jumping and pointing to the wing for the cross court pass. We pass to the wing and he is SCREAMING for the ball with his hands in the ready position. Next thing you know "swish!"
That's the IU we fell in love with. A Coverdale mentality. He know's he's a shooter and wants the ball and knows he can drain it. Sweetness.
Everyone is in love with the incoming class but I'm telling you we have five freshmen right now that will be solid and Dumes has a chance to be All-Big Ten next year with more support around him (and a little more ball control).
They played a decent game last night., glad I went
My one criticism is on the last possession of the game. I think it was a mistake to inbound the ball with 6.2 seconds left and then call another timeout once they crossed mid-court. I know Crean is worried about a young team in a helter-skelter situation and wanted to set something up, but I think their best chance to score would have been just going full speed and attacking the rim. Either get a lay-up or draw a foul. Plus, you let NW set up their defense and had a freshmen inbouding the ball with no timeouts left.
Not a major issue, just something I thought during the last sequence.
PG - Rivers
SG - Dumes
SF - Williams
PF - Pritchard
C- Muniru
Bench
Story
Roth
Hulls
Elston
Watford
creek
I think we can compete for the big ten next year. Rivers experience this year setting on the bench with crean will be great for him as a leader!
Biggest thing is Muniru? Why is he starting over the studs of the class. We cant get numbers on him and whats to say he's even better than Capo or Elston...which I don't think he is.
Next year I donot see Williams or Muniru starting very often . The way Watford is rebounding in HS along w his scoring he will be impossible to keep on the bench. That leaves one slot for alot of players.
Now while I'm not making excuse for the lose, I must make a comment. The kid Coble is good but come on refs, do you even understand the term ESTABLISHED PIVOT FOOT! While he was making his dramatic shots we was walking every time!
It's just so frustrating to see that we've had chances to win four BT games and then lost by a combined total of 17 points - one of those in OT. (I'm not counting Penn State).
It's encouraging at the same time...but ugh...I just want that DAMN WIN!
When a team is terrible - as IU supposedly is - they should be getting blown out by like 30 points, not scrapping for these wins. It's surely a testament to these kids' hustle and teamwork, along with Crean's ability to coach and motivate...but we've got to find a W sometime soon or I'm going to lose it!
Go Hoosiers!
Every time they showed that replay I giggled like a little school girl.
PG Rivers
SG Dumes
SF Watford
PF Pritchard
C Capobianco
Rivers has been waiting to lead a team for three years. To say he is mentally ready is an understatement. Dumes gets talent around him that can give him more space to create. Watford is a match-up nightmare at the SF position. Pritchard gets a lot of garbage points on the weak side. The C position is the question mark. Capobianco fits the mold. Maniru is a project at best much like Jobe.
PG - Jones or Hulls (expect this to be a 2 year battle behind Rivers. Jones very well could transfer at some point. Is he patient enough behind Rivers for two years?)
SG - Creek with Roth busting those zones when needed
SF - Nick Williams
PF - Malik Story
C - Elston (Either Pritchard or Capo will always be on the floor, and Elston gives them a 3rd option in the paint) I think Maniru is at least 2 years away. I hope I'm wrong.
Sorry guys but I don't see Moore getting anything but garbage time after this season unless he can start hitting threes.
The only modifications I would offer is that the most competitve kids today on the roster, based on who is getting better and more consistent, are VJIII and Story. It will be fun to see how they come in next year ready to compete. I imagine VJ as the next Devin Harris....we cannot lose him. I think he can replace Dumes by next year sometime.
I fear Roth, Williams have the most work to do. Is Williams a shooter, a rebounder, a ball handler, a defender or is he all of these or none of these ? Same with Story . It is hard to fit either into a lineup role next year but yet they do many things partially well.
Story being from Ca may be ready to go home but I hope not.
With increased scoring ability next year I think defense will separate who plays who does not. This is why Hulls, Moore, Roth, Creek may be limited in PT even if they can hit 3's. They will need to show they are not a liability on D. Same for Muniru
The jury is still out on Williams too isn't it? I think Nick will also benefit from more talent on the floor. He's automatic from 12 feet in and can get tough rebounds at the 3 spot.
We'll see about Verdell. Ask me again after a game that he doesn't have 7 turnovers! I agree though he has talent.
I think the problem in the future we will face is we have all these kids getting playing time as FR when honestly they should be getting stronger and honing their skills. So when the talent pool immediately doubles, will they have the patience to wait their turn after getting the minutes as underclassmen?
Hey, it's a nice problem to have. But it's still a potential problem.