<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Inside the Hall - Latest Comments in Crawford dunk is the talk of the Interwebs</title><link>http://insidethehall.disqus.com/</link><description>Indiana Hoosiers Basketball News, Recruiting and Analysis</description><atom:link href="https://insidethehall.disqus.com/crawford_dunk_is_the_talk_of_the_interwebs/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:41:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Crawford dunk is the talk of the Interwebs</title><link>https://www.insidethehall.com/2009/07/08/crawford-dunk-is-the-talk-of-the-interwebs/#comment-12418899</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great. Awesome. Crawford was fixin' to tea bag the king.  I'm sure LBJ was D'n him up like he would Kobe in game 7 of the series the wasn't.  Right.  But for LBJ/Nike's overreaction to the tapes, this would have passed faster than LBJ in the post-game hand shake line. No doubt the kid could light it up on occasion (see: UK at AH), but let's not get all Michael Jackson now-he's-dead-who-cares-he-poked-tons-of-little-boys-sentimental on this one.  Remember that suspension?  Anyone?  Did he ever meet a shot he didn't like?  Crawford couldn't spell defense, not to mention attempt to play it.  TUO, maybe.  The one sided wonder, definitely.  Who cares if the kid could put up 50 pts. on any given night; he'd allow 65 from the guy he was guarding.  I'd say his 15 minutes are up about now.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chronic Hoosier</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:41:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crawford dunk is the talk of the Interwebs</title><link>https://www.insidethehall.com/2009/07/08/crawford-dunk-is-the-talk-of-the-interwebs/#comment-12383464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nike - ridiculous!! Good for the Crawford kid. He'll be more of a legend if the tape DOESN'T get out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andybo429</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:22:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crawford dunk is the talk of the Interwebs</title><link>https://www.insidethehall.com/2009/07/08/crawford-dunk-is-the-talk-of-the-interwebs/#comment-12373490</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tim I agree 100% and also why does LeKing get this treatment like a big baby? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kelin Blab</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:28:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crawford dunk is the talk of the Interwebs</title><link>https://www.insidethehall.com/2009/07/08/crawford-dunk-is-the-talk-of-the-interwebs/#comment-12365525</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here's a question,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If there was no policy against video taping, why did these 'journalists' give up their tapes? They didn't legally have too. Journalist need balls. Somewhere in the not too distant past, journalist lost their balls, and this is what's wrong with America: Ballless journalists.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TimEOBrien</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:10:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crawford dunk is the talk of the Interwebs</title><link>https://www.insidethehall.com/2009/07/08/crawford-dunk-is-the-talk-of-the-interwebs/#comment-12359580</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had no clue about this until I checked my e-mail and saw over 30 e-mails for "Comment posted on Jordan Crawford: Dunk Contest winner at IU Midnight Madness video" that I put on YouTube a couple of years ago.  Google'd Crawford and James, and sure enough, there was this.  I do miss the kid and wish he would have stayed, but more than understand.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobertSchell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:48:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crawford dunk is the talk of the Interwebs</title><link>https://www.insidethehall.com/2009/07/08/crawford-dunk-is-the-talk-of-the-interwebs/#comment-12357371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i wonder if TUO could have had a "mulligan" if he would have second thoughts about leaving... im starting to think he maybe would have.. i hope he is happy now but i think maybe by his junior year we would have been calling him "TO" or "THE ONE" instead of TUO!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peaychris</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:28:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crawford dunk is the talk of the Interwebs</title><link>https://www.insidethehall.com/2009/07/08/crawford-dunk-is-the-talk-of-the-interwebs/#comment-12338989</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was always a fan of Jordan, really wished he would have stayed.....Although he is not as good of an athlete, I could see Verdell Jones becoming the same type of player. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kelin Blab</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:23:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crawford dunk is the talk of the Interwebs</title><link>https://www.insidethehall.com/2009/07/08/crawford-dunk-is-the-talk-of-the-interwebs/#comment-12338795</link><description>&lt;p&gt;he won the Kentucky game when Gordon was out too, dude was good that year for a frosh.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SelfImportant Web Asshole </dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:15:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Crawford dunk is the talk of the Interwebs</title><link>https://www.insidethehall.com/2009/07/08/crawford-dunk-is-the-talk-of-the-interwebs/#comment-12337652</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I for one am not surprised. What I liked best about Crawford was that he refused to think of himself as a freshman ........he was fearless.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What most fans do NOT realize is that if Jordan had played the same minutes and games as Gordon he would have :&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- outrebounded Gordon by 40&lt;br&gt;- had 44 fewer turnovers&lt;br&gt;- generated  66 more assists than Gordon&lt;br&gt;- scoring only 7 fewer pts per game&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just a perspective on how good he could have been in an IU uniform&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JerryCT</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:36:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>